SPY rises 0.20% as 7 of 110 setups break out and 29 fail

Market recap, bot performance, and scanner analysis for Monday, June 08.

SPY rises 0.20% as 7 of 110 setups break out and 29 fail

The UnxEdge breakout scanner tracked 110 setups today, and only 7 actually broke despite QQQ finishing green. That mismatch matters: a wedge pattern market that throws more bear setups than bulls while tech indices rip higher is usually a warning that strength was narrow, not clean. Also worth noting, Energy and Semis both flipped to ROTATING IN week-over-week, a real change from last week’s laggard list.

Index performance looked healthy on the surface with SPY up 0.20%, QQQ up 1.47%, and IWM up 0.92%, but the scanner did not confirm that breadth. We got 82 bear setups against just 28 bulls, and 29 failures swamped the 7 confirmed breakouts. The obvious macro read is that traders were willing to pay for select growth and AI-adjacent exposure after the headline around NVIDIA-backed PhysicsX raising $300 million, but not much else. That is not broad risk-on. That is concentrated sponsorship.

The other layer is timing. With CPI due Wednesday morning, a lot of today’s tape looked like pre-event positioning rather than conviction. Defensive and rate-sensitive tells mattered: TLT showed up as a notable bear breakout, which points to pressure on long-duration bonds and a market still not ready to price a clean disinflation glide path. Housing staying relatively strong while bonds weaken is a bit of a contradiction, but it can persist short term if traders are leaning into stock-specific rotation rather than macro consistency. For now, the tradeable implication is simple: trust the names with isolated relative strength, but do not confuse index green with a forgiving breakout tape. For context, here’s yesterday's debrief.

Green indices, weak internals

739.00
SPY +0.20%
715.45
QQQ +1.47%
284.24
IWM +0.92%
110
Setups Scanned
28 / 82
Bull / Bear Setups
7
A-Grade Count
7
Breakouts
29
Failures

The grade distribution stayed decent on paper, but resolution quality did not. One A++ and a combined 64 A/A- setups should produce better than 7 breakouts if the tape is truly healthy. It did not. That is a clean reminder to see live setups in the scanner and focus on confirmed trigger quality, not just pretty grades.

NET bull stopped out

NET BULL STOP
Entry zone: $270.83 to $271.91
Stop: $268.08
TP1: $274.66 | TP2: $277.96
Result: -1.6R

No spin here. Yesterday’s NET long failed, and it failed before proving anything. In this environment, that is the cost of trying to buy isolated strength when the scanner is still leaning heavily bearish under the hood.

Where the volume was today

XHB BULL FAILED
Grade: B
RVOL: 2.34x
Pressure: 84

XHB carried the biggest relative volume on the board, which fits the broader strength in housing, but the setup still failed. That matters more than the RVOL itself. High volume without clean continuation usually means the move was event-driven or flow-driven rather than structurally strong enough to sustain a breakout. In plain English, buyers showed up, but not enough follow-through capital showed up behind them.

No closed trades, one live swing still on

There were no closed bot trades today. You can watch Wex and Xcel trade live in the Edge Lab as the system stays selective through a low-quality breakout tape.

Currently swinging: GOOGL BEAR.

Nothing painful left on the table

CRM BEAR
Grade: A-
Result: +0.59R
RVOL: 1.36x
Impact: Minor miss
LOW BEAR
Grade: B
Result: +0.09R
RVOL: 0.52x
Impact: Minor miss

The numbers say it clearly: one breakout traded, two missed, total opportunity cost basically zero. CRM offered the better miss, but +0.59R is not the kind of oversight that forces a model rewrite. LOW barely moved and came with weak volume confirmation anyway.

Filter insight: today’s misses suggest the filters were mostly doing their job, because the tape did not produce meaningful unclaimed runners.

The tape did not reward aggression

7
Breakouts
29
Failures
1
Expired
19%
Breakout Share

Notable breakouts came from LOW bear B, EA bull B+, NEE bear A-, BABA bear A-, TLT bear A-, and SPOT bull B. Mixed leadership, mixed sectors, and very little broad confirmation. That is usually a tape for smaller size and faster judgment.

A 19% breakout share tells you the market was tradable only in spots, not broadly supportive of indiscriminate breakout exposure.

Specific levels matter more than opinions ahead of CPI

These are the unresolved A and A- names still coiling. If they trigger, they matter. If they do not, leave them alone. You can see live setups in the scanner for real-time trigger movement.

SOXS BEAR
Grade: A | Pressure: 45 | Distance: 17.184% | RVOL: 1.86x
Entry trigger: break below today’s wedge support
Stop: reclaim of wedge breakdown level
TP1: first measured move extension from the trigger
SQQQ BEAR
Grade: A- | Pressure: 54 | Distance: 12.828% | RVOL: 1.49x
Entry trigger: loss of active wedge support
Stop: back above breakdown pivot
TP1: initial 1R objective off the trigger
PFE BEAR
Grade: A- | Pressure: 59 | Distance: 1.466% | RVOL: 1.24x
Entry trigger: breakdown through near-term support shelf
Stop: recovery back inside the wedge
TP1: next daily support zone
NVDA BEAR
Grade: A | Pressure: 85 | Distance: 1.736% | RVOL: 1.0x
Entry trigger: confirmed loss of wedge floor
Stop: reclaim of trigger and failed breakdown
TP1: first downside extension toward prior intraday support
GDX BEAR
Grade: A- | Pressure: 67 | Distance: 0.242% | RVOL: 1.0x
Entry trigger: clean break under compression support
Stop: move back above the wedge
TP1: prior swing low retest

NVDA is the one to respect most from a market-impact standpoint. If that A-grade bear setup confirms, it would line up with the scanner’s underlying skepticism even after today’s growth bid. If it fails and squeezes instead, short-side conviction in tech probably gets run over into CPI.

Leadership changed, but not cleanly

Energy +3.32% vs SPY
Biotech +3.20% vs SPY
Retail +2.74% vs SPY
Housing +1.69% vs SPY
Materials -0.35% vs SPY
Semis -2.71% vs SPY
Gold -7.97% vs SPY
Metals -8.04% vs SPY

Five-day relative strength still shows Energy